Academy

Academy / Lessons / Day-to-day practice / EP86

Hire purchase and term loans: that "four per cent" is not actually four per cent

The salesman says "the interest is very low, only four per cent". The true rate on that loan is closer to eight. He did not lie to you — he was quoting a flat rate and you were thinking of a reducing balance. And this June, the rules changed.

EP 865 min readEnglish2026-09-05
EP86 — Hire purchase and term loans: that

This is the text version of a Mandarin video lesson — watch the original on the 中文 page. The script is written out in full below.

01Key points

02The figures

Flat rate vs reducing balance — the same "four per cent", two ways of computing it

Flat rate (how hire purchase has traditionally quoted it)Reducing balance (how a bank term loan quotes it)
Computed on whatThe amount you borrowed, unchanged from start to finishThe amount you still owe, reducing each period
A hypothetical example: borrow RM100,000 · 5 years · 4%Interest 100,000 × 4% × 5 = RM20,000; RM120,000 repayable in all, over 60 instalmentsThe same 4% computed on the balance, and the total interest is far below RM20,000
ConvertedFlat rate 4% ≈ reducing balance 7–8%
Settling early (an older agreement signed before 2026-06-01)The rebate is computed by the Rule of 78: most of the interest falls in the early years, so the rebate is smallComputed on the balance, so you do save
Settling early (a new agreement from 2026-06-01)The Rule of 78 is abolished; the effective interest rate, on a reducing balance is used insteadUnchanged

The example is a hypothetical demonstration, not the real figures of any bank or any car. Practice differs from one financier to another during the transition, and on an older agreement the settlement figure your financier notifies to you governs. Verified as at 2026-09-03.

How each repayment is posted, and how it is deducted for tax

WhenHow the books are doneFor tax
On purchaseThe asset goes in at the cash price; the principal payable is recorded as a liabilityThe asset takes capital allowances, computed on the cash price, not on the total you repaid
On each monthly repaymentThe principal part reduces the liability; the interest part goes to the profit and lossInterest is deductible; principal is not (repaying debt is not an expense)
The whole instalment taken as an expense (wrong)Costs overstated, profit understated; and that vehicle never appears on the balance sheetThe capital allowance cannot be computed; and when you want a loan or want to sell the company, that vehicle cannot be found
A private-use motor vehicleAs aboveThe qualifying expenditure for capital allowances is capped, so it is not that the more expensive it is, the more you deduct; the cap amount is not set out on this page, and the current provisions of Schedule 3 of the Income Tax Act 1967 govern

General information, not financial, tax or legal advice; the terms of your own agreement with your financier govern. LTT Outsourced CFO Sdn. Bhd. is not a licensed tax agent, and its services are cloud bookkeeping, document digitisation and the preparation of reports. Verified as at 2026-09-03.

03Text version

Hook

You are buying a car for the company, and the salesman tells you: "The interest is very low, only four per cent." It sounds cheap, so you sign. The true rate on that loan is closer to eight per cent. The salesman did not lie to you. He was quoting a flat rate. And what you had in your head was the reducing balance you get on a bank loan. Both are called an "interest rate", and the methods are completely different — roughly a factor of two. And this June, the rules on this changed. Most bosses do not know yet.

Two kinds of interest rate, and where they differ

Let me set out the two methods. The first: a flat rate. It is computed on "the amount you borrowed", and it does not change from start to finish. Take a hypothetical example: borrow RM100,000 over five years at a flat rate of four per cent. How is the interest computed? RM100,000 × four per cent × five years = RM20,000. RM120,000 repayable in total, over 60 instalments. Notice that RM100,000 — in year two you have already repaid part of the principal, but the interest is still computed on RM100,000. In year five you have only a little principal left, and the interest is still computed on RM100,000. The second: a reducing balance. It is computed on "the amount you still owe". Repay the principal from RM100,000 down to RM80,000 and the interest is computed from RM80,000; down to RM50,000 and it is computed from RM50,000. The more you repay, the less the interest. Hire purchase has traditionally quoted a flat rate. A bank term loan quotes a reducing balance. Put those two quotations side by side — you are not comparing the same thing.

Settling early: why it used to save you nothing

The second thing, and more people have been burned by it. "If I settle early, do I save a lot of interest?" The answer used to be: not much. Why? Because traditional hire purchase computes the rebate by a method called the Rule of 78. What that rule does is load most of the interest into the early years of the repayment term. So you borrow over five years, and after two years you want to clear it — you find you have already paid most of the five years' interest. The rebate is small, and you do not save much. Plenty of bosses find this out for the first time when they ring up to ask for the settlement figure. "I have been paying for two years, how do I still owe this much?" That is why.

This June the rules changed (the most important part of this episode)

Now the most important part, because it is new. The hire purchase legislation was amended with effect from 1 June 2026. Two big things changed. First, the Rule of 78 is abolished. Second, new hire purchase agreements are computed on the effective interest rate, on a reducing balance. What those two together mean is this: it is a change in favour of the borrower. And what about agreements already signed? For the older batch, the banks have an arrangement — there is a discount on early settlement. And there is a transition period on this — the pace at which each bank rebuilds its systems is different, so practice during the transition will differ from one to another. The precise transitional arrangements are on the episode page, because they will change, and because it depends which financier you signed with.

How to do the books (the part most people get wrong)

Now the books. This part is where most people go wrong, and the mistake is expensive. The instalment you pay each month is not an expense. Say that again: the whole instalment cannot be taken as a cost. Why? Because there are two things inside that instalment. Part of it is principal — that is repaying debt, not an expense. Part of it is interest — that is the expense. So how are the books done? On purchase: that vehicle, that machine, is recorded as an asset at its "cash price". The principal payable is recorded as a liability. On each monthly repayment: the principal part reduces the liability. Only the interest part goes to the profit and loss. If you take the whole instalment as an expense, your costs will be overstated, your profit understated, and that vehicle will never have appeared on the balance sheet at all. And then when you want a loan, want to sell the company, or want to compute capital allowances — that vehicle cannot be found. (We said in the episode on accounting schedules: behind every figure there should be a schedule. This one especially.)

How it is deducted for tax

Get the books right and the tax follows. Three lines. One, interest is deductible. It is the cost of the financing. Two, principal is not deductible. Repaying debt is not a cost. Three, that vehicle, that machine — takes capital allowances, computed on the "cash price". Not on the total you repaid. You paid RM120,000 in all for that machine, but the capital allowance looks at the machine's cash price — RM100,000. The extra RM20,000 is interest, and it goes down a different route. ⚠️ And one cap to flag: the amount of capital allowance available on a private-use motor vehicle has a ceiling — it is not that the more expensive the car, the more you deduct. The amount is on the episode page. This is the other side of the same coin as our episode on cars and petrol: buying the car goes down the capital allowance route, using the car goes down the expense-proportion route.

So which one should you use

The last question: hire purchase, or a term loan? There is no standard answer, but there is a way to judge. Hire purchase is tied to a thing — a car, a machine, equipment. The thing itself is the security. So approval is usually quicker and easier to get. A term loan hands you a sum of money — the use is freer, it is usually computed on a reducing balance, but approval looks at your whole business and takes more paperwork. But whichever route you take — work out two things first. One, once both are converted to the same method, which is genuinely cheaper. Two, what share of your monthly cash flow this instalment takes. The second matters more than the first. Borrowing is not about whether you can get it — it is about whether you can repay it.

To close

One line to close: we have made this conversion into a free tool — flat rate, Rule of 78 and reducing balance, all three computed for you, with the whole repayment schedule and what an early settlement would cost laid out. It is at free.lttcfo.ai, open and use, no sign-up. Next time before you sign, throw the numbers in and run it once. Want to know whether the ones you already have are recorded correctly? Grab a coffee first and talk about your business. For the accounting, come to LTT. I am LTT, helping SME bosses get their accounts straight. Follow us, and see you next time.

04Common questions

A flat rate of four per cent is roughly what in bank terms?

Roughly seven to eight per cent. A flat rate is computed on the amount you borrowed from start to finish, while a reducing balance is computed on what you still owe, so the same figure represents roughly twice the cost. To compare, convert both to the same method first.

What did the amendment of 1 June 2026 change?

Two big things: the Rule of 78 is abolished, and new hire purchase agreements are computed on the effective interest rate, on a reducing balance. On newly signed agreements you genuinely save by settling early, and the rate you are shown is closer to the real thing. Older agreements have a discount arrangement, and during the transition each financier does it differently — go by what your own financier tells you.

Can the monthly hire purchase instalment be taken as an expense in full?

No. There are two things inside that instalment: the principal is repaying debt and reduces the liability; only the interest is an expense and goes to the profit and loss. On purchase, that vehicle or machine is recorded as an asset at its cash price and the principal payable is recorded as a liability. Take the whole instalment as an expense and your costs are overstated, your profit understated, and that vehicle disappears from the balance sheet as well.

Which part is deductible for tax?

Interest is deductible, being the cost of the financing; principal is not deductible, because repaying debt is not a cost; and that vehicle or machine takes capital allowances computed on the cash price, not on the total you repaid. The capital allowance on a private-use motor vehicle has a separate cap; the cap amount is not set out as verified on this page, and the current provisions of Schedule 3 of the Income Tax Act 1967 govern.

Should I choose hire purchase or a term loan?

Hire purchase is tied to a thing (a car, a machine, equipment) and the thing itself is the security, so approval is quick and easier to get; a term loan hands you a sum of money, the use is free and it is usually computed on a reducing balance, but approval looks at the whole business and takes more paperwork. Buying a specific thing mostly goes down the hire purchase route, while working capital or refinancing older debt is what a term loan is for — and whichever route you take, look first at what share of your monthly cash flow the instalment takes.

More in this seriesEP83 Allowances and incentives · EP84 Entertainment, petrol, cars · EP85 Free tools
Grab a coffee with us and talk about your business — leave the accounts to LTT. Write to ltt@lttcfo.com · WhatsApp 011-1955 5538

05Comments

General information, not financial, tax or legal advice; the terms that bind you are the ones in your own contract with the financier. LTT Outsourced CFO Sdn. Bhd. is not a licensed tax agent — the practice does cloud bookkeeping, document digitisation and the preparation of accounts. The amendments to the hire purchase legislation, the transitional arrangements and the capital allowance ceiling were checked against the legislation on 3 September 2026.

Verified as at 2026-09-05 · This lesson demonstrates year-specific figures (rates, caps, reliefs). The rules are revised yearly, the figures LHDN publishes for the year in question govern, and individual circumstances differ.